Effect of Oral Valproic Acid vs Placebo for Vision Loss in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Randomized Phase 2 Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Publication Type
Journal Article
Year of Publication
Birch, David G; Bernstein, Paul S; Iannacone, Alessandro; Pennesi, Mark E; Lam, Byron L; Heckenlively, John; Csaky, Karl; Hartnett, Mary Elizabeth; Winthrop, Kevin L; Jayasundera, Thiran; Hughbanks-Wheaton, Dianna K; Warner, Judith; Yang, Paul; Fish, Gary Edd; Teske, Michael P; Sklaver, Neal L; Erker, Laura; Chegarnov, Elvira; Smith, Travis; Wahle, Aimee; VanVeldhuisen, Paul C; McCormack, Jennifer; Lindblad, Robert; Bramer, Steven; Rose, Stephen; Zilliox, Patricia; Francis, Peter J; Weleber, Richard G
JAMA Ophthalmol
Date Published
2018 08 01
Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Electroretinography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Prospective Studies; retina; Retinitis Pigmentosa; Rhodopsin; Valproic Acid; Vision Disorders; visual acuity; Visual Field Tests; Visual Fields

Importance: There are no approved drug treatments for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, a relentlessly progressive cause of adult and childhood blindness.

Objectives: To evaluate the potential efficacy and assess the safety of orally administered valproic acid (VPA) in the treatment of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, phase 2, prospective, interventional, placebo-controlled, double-masked randomized clinical trial. The study took place in 6 US academic retinal degeneration centers. Individuals with genetically characterized autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were randomly assigned to receive treatment or placebo for 12 months. Analyses were intention-to-treat.

Interventions: Oral VPA 500 mg to 1000 mg daily for 12 months or placebo.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was determined prior to study initiation as the change in visual field area (assessed by the III4e isopter, semiautomated kinetic perimetry) between baseline and month 12.

Results: The mean (SD) age of the 90 participants was 50.4 (11.6) years. Forty-four (48.9%) were women, 87 (96.7%) were white, and 79 (87.8%) were non-Hispanic. Seventy-nine participants (87.8%) completed the study (42 [95.5%] received placebo and 37 [80.4%] received VPA). Forty-two (46.7%) had a rhodopsin mutation. Most adverse events were mild, although 7 serious adverse events unrelated to VPA were reported. The difference between the VPA and placebo arms for mean change in the primary outcome was -150.43 degree2 (95% CI, -290.5 to -10.03; Pā€‰=ā€‰.035).

Conclusions and Relevance: This negative value indicates that the VPA arm had worse outcomes than the placebo group. This study brings to light the key methodological considerations that should be applied to the rigorous evaluation of treatments for these conditions. This study does not provide support for the use of VPA in the treatment of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01233609.