The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS): design implications. AREDS report no. 1.

Publication Type
Journal Article
Year of Publication
Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group
Control Clin Trials
Date Published
1999 Dec
Aged; Aged, 80 and over; aging; Antioxidants; Ascorbic Acid; cataract; Disease Progression; Drug Monitoring; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Macular Degeneration; Middle Aged; Placebos; Prospective Studies; Research Design; Risk Factors; safety; Vitamin E; Zinc

The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) was initially conceived as a long-term multicenter, prospective study of the clinical course of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and age-related cataract. Data on progression rates and risk factors from the study will increase understanding of the clinical course of both conditions, generate hypotheses about etiology, and aid in the design of clinical trials of potential interventions. In addition to collecting natural history data, AREDS includes a clinical trial of high-dose vitamin and mineral supplements for AMD and a clinical trial of high-dose vitamin supplements for cataract. The clinical trials were initiated largely because of the widespread public use in the United States of commercially available pharmacologic doses of vitamins and minerals to treat these two eye conditions and the absence of definitive studies on the safety and efficacy of their use. Important design issues for the clinical trials include: defining cataract and AMD, estimating event rates, determining the type and dosage of vitamins and minerals to be tested for each condition, and identifying the parameters necessary for monitoring safety and efficacy. This paper describes the AREDS design, including the study rationale and operational structure, and the approach adopted to combine, for two diseases, clinical trials with a natural history study.