Treatment of refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia with fludarabine phosphate via the group C protocol mechanism of the National Cancer Institute: five-year follow-up report.

Publication Type
Journal Article
Year of Publication
Sorensen, J M; Vena, D A; Fallavollita, A; Chun, H G; Cheson, B D
J Clin Oncol
Date Published
1997 Feb
Adult; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Clinical Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell; Male; Middle Aged; National Institutes of Health (U.S.); Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vidarabine Phosphate

PURPOSE: To provide fludarabine to physicians for the management of patients with advanced refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and to determine the response rate and duration, toxicity, and survival with this agent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II protocol was open to all eligible patients whose local physicians obtained written permission from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to register patients onto this protocol. Of 791 national and international enrolled patients, 724 with a median age of 65 years received fludarabine, of which 703 were assessable for response.

RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of assessable patients responded (95% confidence interval [CI], 29% to 36%), with 21 patients (3%) obtaining a complete response and 205 (29%) a partial response. The median duration of response was 13.1 months and the median survival time from registration was 12.6 months. Age, performance status (PS), and Rai stage correlated with survival (P < .01). Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was reported in 43% and was associated with infection in 22%. Neurotoxicity (primarily grade 1 motor dysfunction) was reported in 14% patients and correlated with age.

CONCLUSION: This study describes the toxicity and activity of fludarabine in refractory CLL in a setting that more closely resembles clinical practice than most published trials. The low response rate may be related to advanced stage (89% Rai high-risk), disease-related symptoms (63% had B symptoms), and/or degree of prior treatment. Other contributing factors inherent in a group C treatment protocol included lack of central pathology review, variable supportive care, and a tendency to use this mechanism at a later stage in the disease.