Resource Center

Go back to Resource Center

Epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy in children and young adults.

2017 Apr

Journal Article

Authors:
Jones, S.M.; Sicherer, S.H.; Burks, W.; Leung, D.Y.M.; Lindblad, R.W.; Dawson, P.; Henning, A.K.; Berin, C.; Chiang, D.; Vickery, B.P.; Pesek, R.D.; Cho, C.B.; Davidson, W.F.; Plaut, M.; Sampson, H.A.; Wood, R.A.

Secondary:
J Allergy Clin Immunol

Volume:
139

Pagination:
1242-1252.e9

Issue:
4

PMID:
28091362

DOI:
10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.017

Keywords:
Adolescent; Adult; allergens; Child; Child, Preschool; Desensitization, Immunologic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Male; Peanut Hypersensitivity; Transdermal Patch; Young Adult

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is common, life-threatening, and without therapeutic options. We evaluated peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) by using Viaskin Peanut for peanut allergy treatment.OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical, safety, and immunologic effects of EPIT for the treatment of peanut allergy.METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 74 participants with peanut allergy (ages 4-25 years) were treated with placebo (n = 25), Viaskin Peanut 100 μg (VP100; n = 24) or Viaskin Peanut 250 μg (VP250; n = 25; DBV Technologies, Montrouge, France). The primary outcome was treatment success after 52 weeks, which was defined as passing a 5044-mg protein oral food challenge or achieving a 10-fold or greater increase in successfully consumed dose from baseline to week 52. Adverse reactions and mechanistic changes were assessed.RESULTS: At week 52, treatment success was achieved in 3 (12%) placebo-treated participants, 11 (46%) VP100 participants, and 12 (48%) VP250 participants (P = .005 and P = .003, respectively, compared with placebo; VP100 vs VP250, P = .48). Median change in successfully consumed doses were 0, 43, and 130 mg of protein in the placebo, VP100, and VP250 groups, respectively (placebo vs VP100, P = .014; placebo vs VP250, P = .003). Treatment success was higher among younger children (P = .03; age, 4-11 vs >11 years). Overall, 14.4% of placebo doses and 79.8% of VP100 and VP250 doses resulted in reactions, predominantly local patch-site and mild reactions (P = .003). Increases in peanut-specific IgG levels and IgG/IgE ratios were observed in peanut EPIT-treated participants, along with trends toward reduced basophil activation and peanut-specific T2 cytokines.CONCLUSIONS: Peanut EPIT administration was safe and associated with a modest treatment response after 52 weeks, with the highest responses among younger children. This, when coupled with a high adherence and retention rate and significant changes in immune pathways, supports further investigation of this novel therapy.

Go back to Resource Center