Resource Center

Go back to Resource Center

Treatment patterns of in-patient spasticity medication use after traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study.

2018 12

Journal Article

Authors:
Holtz, K.A.; Szefer, E.; Noonan, V.K.; Kwon, B.K.; Mills, P.B.

Secondary:
Spinal Cord

Volume:
56

Pagination:
1176-1183

Issue:
12

PMID:
29904191

DOI:
10.1038/s41393-018-0165-0

Keywords:
Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Spasticity; Neuromuscular Agents; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Spinal Cord Injuries; Young Adult

Abstract:
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study using the Rick Hansen SCI Registry (RHSCIR) and retrospective medical chart review.OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment patterns of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) in acute and rehabilitation hospital settings in British Columbia, Canada.SETTING: Quaternary trauma center, rehabilitation center.METHODS: Individuals with traumatic SCI between 2005 and 2014 enrolled in the Vancouver RHSCIR site (N = 917) were eligible for inclusion. Oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use were the main outcome measures.RESULTS: In 769 participants, higher neurological level and injury severity were associated with in-patient anti-spasticity medication use (p < 0.001 for both). Of individuals with cervical and thoracic injuries (n = 589), 37% were prescribed anti-spasticity medication during hospital admission. Baclofen was the most commonly used first line oral therapy. Mean (SD) and median time from injury to Baclofen initiation was 70 (69) and 50 days, respectively. The probability of having initiated an in-patient anti-spasticity medication was 55% (95% CI (49, 60)) for individuals 6 months post-injury, and 71% (95% CI (62, 79)) for individuals 12 months post-injury. At community discharge, the prevalence of oral and injectable anti-spasticity medication use was 26 and 5%. Practice patterns of anti-spasticity medication use (2005-2009 vs. 2010-2014) have not changed significantly over time.CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large prospective cohort study of in-patient anti-spasticity medication use following traumatic SCI. Results from our study inform clinicians and individuals of "real world" anti-spasticity medication use among individuals with traumatic SCI and may help guide care for this population in the community.

Go back to Resource Center