Resource Center

Go back to Resource Center

Gilteritinib as Post-Transplant Maintenance for AML With Internal Tandem Duplication Mutation of FLT3

05/2024

Journal Article

Authors:
Levis, M. J.; Hamadani, M.; Logan, B.; Jones, R. J.; Singh, A. K.; Litzow, M.; Wingard, J. R.; Papadopoulos, E. B.; Perl, A. E.; Soiffer, R. J.; Ustun, C.; Ueda Oshima, M.; Uy, G. L.; Waller, E. K.; Vasu, S.; Solh, M.; Mishra, A.; Muffly, L.; Kim, H. J.; Mikesch, J. H.; Najima, Y.; Onozawa, M.; Thomson, K.; Nagler, A.; Wei, A. H.; Marcucci, G.; Geller, N. L.; Hasabou, N.; Delgado, D.; Rosales, M.; Hill, J.; Gill, S. C.; Nuthethi, R.; King, D.; Wittsack, H.; Mendizabal, A.; Devine, S. M.; Horowitz, M. M.; Chen, Y. B.; Bmt-Ctn Morpho Study Investigators

Volume:
42

Pagination:
1766-1775

Issue:
15

Journal:
J Clin Oncol

PMID:
38471061

URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38471061

DOI:
10.1200/JCO.23.02474

Keywords:
Humans *fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics *Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics/drug therapy/therapy/mortality Male Female Middle Aged *Pyrazines/therapeutic use Adult *Aniline Compounds/therapeutic use *Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation *Mutation Aged Tandem Repeat Sequences Young Adult Neoplasm, Residual Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use Maintenance Chemotherapy Gene Duplication

Abstract:
PURPOSE: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves outcomes for patients with AML harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) AML. These patients are routinely treated with a FLT3 inhibitor after HCT, but there is limited evidence to support this. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized trial of post-HCT maintenance with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02997202) to determine if all such patients benefit or if detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) could identify those who might benefit. METHODS: Adults with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and were randomly assigned to placebo or 120 mg once daily gilteritinib for 24 months after HCT. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and the effect of MRD pre- and post-HCT on RFS and OS. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-six participants were randomly assigned post-HCT to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Although RFS was higher in the gilteritinib arm, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.679 [95% CI, 0.459 to 1.005]; two-sided P = .0518). However, 50.5% of participants had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT, and, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, gilteritinib was beneficial in this population (HR, 0.515 [95% CI, 0.316 to 0.838]; P = .0065). Those without detectable MRD showed no benefit (HR, 1.213 [95% CI, 0.616 to 2.387]; P = .575). CONCLUSION: Although the overall improvement in RFS was not statistically significant, RFS was higher for participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD pre- or post-HCT who received gilteritinib treatment. To our knowledge, these data are among the first to support the effectiveness of MRD-based post-HCT therapy.

Go back to Resource Center